Moon Landing Hoax Theories Can All Be Debunked By The Original Photos (The "New" Filming Setup)

مشترک شدن

بازدید 174K

98% 1 723 19

Amazingly, some people still believe we didn't land on the moon despite the fact that most of the conspiracy theories can be easily debunked using the original moon landing photographs.
Today I Found Out Video:
iritem.info/cd/fy-lm-h-y/ZrafhcfKs6bed2Q.html
To watch the Raw Cuts of Videos, check out:
iritem.info
-----------------------------------------
Join us on Twitch:
www.twitch.tv/karlswood
Fact Fiend Merchandise available at:
www.redbubble.com/people/factfiend
-----------------------------------------
Starring Karl Smallwood
iritem.info/life/UaBEY5s2anSFnsX5oEvjdg
KarlSmallwood
karlswood
Filmed by Nisha Revill:
iritem.info/life/HY9c2Tm4Ufu56hxYUklPbw
midnight_neesh
midnightneesh
Edited by Brad Rawlinson
iritem.info
BradJRawlinson
bradrawlinson27
-----------------------------------------
Original Article:
www.factfiend.com/moon-landing-hoax-theories-can-debunked-original-photos/
Sources:
www.studyphysics.ca/apollo2.pdf
spacecentre.co.uk/blog-post/know-moon-landing-really-happened/
www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2019/05/who-started-the-moon-landing-hoax-conspiracy-theory/
Clips:
Apollo 11 Moon Landing (1969)
www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/apollo/apollo11.html
Images:
The Moon, Gregory H. Revera, CC BY-SA 3.0 creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0, via Wikimedia Commons
NASA Logo, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Moon Landing Photographs, NASA / Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Bill Kaysing's Book, www.amazon.co.uk/We-Never-Went-Moon-Americas/dp/1973811871
Music:
From filmmusic.io
"Two Finger Johnny" by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
License: CC BY (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

کمدی

تاریخ انتشار

2021 8 فوریه

هم‌رسانی:

دانلود:

..بارگذاری...

افزودن به:

لیست پخش من

تماشا در فرصتی دیگر

نظر 100

Deus 0rcinus پیش 20 روز

If you look at the original pictures of the moon landing and the "space walk" where are all the stars?

T. Shaw Photography پیش 9 ساعت

This is so bait

Bruh Moment پیش 23 ساعت

@Raik Actually Buzz Aldrin punched a tabloid author in the face after said tabloid author harassed him for weeks on end, in self defense. Buzz Aldrin was 72 btw, while Bart Sibrel the literal stalking dick was 37.

Sensei پیش 4 روز

@NO FEAR 1979 ok buddy, keep thinking that

NO FEAR 1979 پیش 4 روز

@Sensei everything we've been taught is lies. From NASA, media, pagan holidays and now covid-19. If you do real research it's easy to find. But you all will call me crazy and not look into anything. It's your life do as you want. Keep complying and all your rights will be gone.

Sensei پیش 4 روز

@NO FEAR 1979 for what specifically? 🤨 there has been alot of shit spewed in this thread.

reizig پیش 4 دقیقه

Hey dude, can you get like tinted contacts or something to help with the eye strain?

Silver Productions پیش 6 ساعت

Quarfiend huh, I haven’t heard that name in a long time

Tyler Anselmo پیش 9 ساعت

The shadows on the buzz aldrin photo look off though

CheyLikesPie پیش 10 ساعت

I frequently do props for stage productions and have never seen anyone mark or write on a prop in anyway unless it's supposed to be like that. Maybe film is different, but I'm wondering where people got that from. Especially if this theory was coined by someone who knows nothing of production (or space travel for that matter lol)

Colin Grant پیش روز

What about the van Allen belt? How did they pass through it if you ask google it will tell you they took a northern trajectory but if you ask google what trajectory they actually took they went right through the van Allen belt. They have lied about something.

Adam Lewer پیش 2 روز

Hrm, I've got the F***ing Sun as a backdrop, but maybe I should lug a freaking spotlight 238,900 mi from the Earth to get a good shot...

John Sidney پیش 3 روز

Wonder how much nasa paid for this

Frodo Falk پیش 3 روز

Hey to be fair the "c" thing couldve just as well have been edited out of the nasa original after it was discovered. Not siding with the conspiracy thoeries but that would be just as likely as a hair getting on a later copy. Other two examples are more solid

Official comity of time travelers Member 0-13 پیش 3 روز

1:37 “without incident.” Apollo 1 would like to know you’re location.

Stephen E پیش 5 روز

A wind machine also would have blown dust all over the place

Midnight Ryder پیش 5 روز

It wasn’t without incident. We lost 3 great pilots/astronauts during a test on the launchpad during Apollo 8.

jacob billups پیش 6 روز

I thought when you were talking about your shadow at the end you were going to bring in the fact that if they were trying to film/fake the moon landing the lighting needed to make the shadows correct was pretty much impossible at the time. Since the sun was bathing the moons surface from the horizon (really f*cling far away) you get all parallel shadows. If you used any kind of studio lighting the shadows would’ve gone off on different angles. Trying to recreate that effect in 1969 would’ve been straight up impossible

Wagner Rocha پیش 6 روز

Listen to Joe Rogan discuss it.. it’s definitely interesting and there are at least some plot holes with the official story. But I believe it happened

Fallenfantasy174 پیش 6 روز

Can you not point your spotlight at another wall to get more of a bounce light that's even with your room's light? And raise the video brightness/contrast? Just guesses based on how I have to light my room at times.

Marcus Carter پیش 7 روز

Fly to the moon again? Nope - lost the technology. Go to Mars? Noooo Problem.

RZU 147 پیش 6 روز

No? NASA is currently planning new moon missions

Shaun Douglas پیش 8 روز

My mom believes they went to space but didn't go on the moon

Major Mystery پیش 8 روز

Idk how people believe that they faked the moon landing when the MOON ISN'T FUCKING REAL. Like how do you fake it when it's painted onto the sky???

XVHK Green پیش 9 روز

is your tattoo of space? imagine getting a tattoo of a lie, lol

XVHK Green پیش 9 روز

you self harmed your arm for attention. who's really the sane one here?

lity fity پیش 9 روز

bruh time!

tony motorrad پیش 9 روز

Shame your a kid with comedy stories your debunking of shit evidence shows that your just trying to show off for your teenage friends did you get the tats for Christmas

1000000man1 پیش 11 روز

What's funny is that to Debunk the Conspiracy "Theorists" you Don't need to know anything about science. All you need is the most Basic understanding of Photography. There's also People who say you should be able to see the stars but if they knew anything at all about photography, they'd know that the stars are too dim and the light reflected off the Moon's surface is too bright. If you tried to allow enough light in the camera to show the stars, the Moon's surface would be so bright, the photo would be completely ruined.

Project Starter پیش 11 روز

Two that you could have also talked about if you had more time: Shadows pointing in different directions. In some pictures it kind of looks like shadows from different objects are pointing in different directions, AHA say the idiots, multiple light sources! There are 3-4 problems with this theory: 1. It's very hard to accurately tell which direction a shadow is going from a distance unless you're above it. 2. Multiple lights cast multiple shadows from each object, not 1 from each in different directions. 3. Long shadows on uneven surfaces always look like that, you could go out in the evening and easily take a picture of sunlight shadows looking weird like that (hoax nuts don't go outside enough). 4. NASA are clever enough to fool the world, but used multiple lights. The second good one is the "duplicate backgrounds". A couple of pictures with different foregrounds, but the same hills in background, looking exactly the same. Again, NASA goes to all this trouble, then reuse a backdrop? Actually, the "hills" are distant mountains (no atmosphere = no haze = you can't tell how far away things are from one photo), so big and far, that they hardly seem to change as the photographer moves some short distance. The key word being "hardly". They are slightly different if you overlay one over the other and carefully compare... just like two pictures of a distant mountain on earth would if they're taken far enough apart.

b b پیش 11 روز

Eh you didnt even go over the most popular moonlanding theories at all, if you gonna make this video at least do it right.

RenchesAndSords پیش 12 روز

blink twice if you're actually secretly Danny from business blaze and your "bedroom" is actually a concrete cellar

CuckooBird پیش 12 روز

Little do people know the truth is the moon isn't real. It's a collective hallucination to cover up the giant space octopus heating up our planet for dinner

Aarcus Is Loading پیش 12 روز

Ugly tat AND they got money for it =) bosses. film + Radiation = no picture =O science say what?

RZU 147 پیش 6 روز

It's busy laughing at you buddy

Francesca Greetham پیش 12 روز

Got so excited and did a little squeal cos I have that same t-shirt!

Michał Godlewski پیش 12 روز

He laughs a lot but doesn't really explain anything.

Fred H پیش 12 روز

Honestly, I enjoy it more now that your stuck against a wall and not having fun

Bobby Hamilton III پیش 13 روز

The head of NASA confirmed the video of the original landing was faked because the filming equipment was damaged during the voyage. Idk wtf to believe, these people lie about any and everything anyway.

Colin Reece پیش 13 روز

NASA did try to fake the moon landing, but hired Bruckheimer to direct it and he INSISTED that they film on location.

Billy Gunn پیش 13 روز

How about the picture of the Earth from moon that was photoshopped? Earth should have been much bigger, is five times bigger than the moon, right? Also, Earth should have been overhead, not to the side. Just a bunch of nonsense. They say moon rotating too, but we don't see it cuz it's magically synched up with Earth's spinning, such gibberish.

Christopher Douglas پیش 14 روز

watch "apollo zero" and get back to me they full of shit bro. the trips in the 60s they lied about, we aint been back because they cannot. van allen radiation belts, and the temps on the moon from shade to light is 300 degrees or some thing ridiculous and they dancing in tin foil suits lol. we aint been back is proof they had less tech than a calculator watch lol

Chris Kratzke پیش 14 روز

I kind of like your channel so please don’t entertain these jerks who call the moon lander fake I grew up with all that stuff it’s just about the only thing I remember about being a kid watching my father working so hard on that and always asking him all kinds of questions about his work on all kinds of space exploration stuff 🤠I am real so I highly doubt all of my memories are fake🤠so please don’t entertain those jerks again ever!!!!!!!🤠

L3ttuc3 پیش 14 روز

Nobody marks props that way lol. Somebody pulled that out if their ass

AlexSDU پیش 15 روز

Fun facts, the flag that Neil & Buzz planted fell down right at the moment when the Lunar Lander took off to leave Moon. The next Lunar landing, they planted the flag a bit further from the landing site. Also, all the flag American flags on the Moon have turned to white flags because they got bleached by the Sun's unfiltered rays.

Rudder پیش 15 روز

It is always so painful having all these conspiracy theorists ask these questions... it just proves that they have no idea of the functions or specifics of the technology being used even though something as simply understood as Camera exposure and aperture can debunk them but yet they choose to not learn or just down right ignore you calling you a Nasa Shill or a paid actor XD

Marie-Oliver Delacroix پیش 15 روز

Where's the fact fiend about cloud people? TALK ABOUT THE CLOUD PEOPLE (_)_):::::::::::D~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sam پیش 15 روز

Why is Carl's bedroom wall just bare concrete? Does he live in a prison?

Justin Holmes Realtor پیش 15 روز

Ahh America went to the moon, but Russia went to Venus. Well the first planetary landing, video and sound on a different planet was all done by Russia while America was landing on the moon

ふぁみ پیش 15 روز

me on the moon: me: dude check that out buzz: what? me: its a fucking rock holy shit buzz: no shit me: im gonna hit it buzz: what me: with a hammer. im gonna hit it with a hammer buzz: what the fuck is wrong with you why are you even here me: right now. im gonna smash it buzz: dude what lmao me: unga bunga space rock insides

spsilcox پیش 16 روز

158+ plus conspiracy theorists

RobbieCBPBarlow پیش 16 روز

The thing about conspiracy theories is that, to be credible it can't just be a case of HOW they pulled it off but WHY. So many theories go around without a good reason as to why someone would do such a thing other than "to deceive the public" (yes, but why deceive them? What do they stand to gain from deceiving the public? Then it'd just be a prank and not a conspiracy?) Another example is 9/11 conspiracies surrounding inside jobs, steel beams etc. and the plausibility factor - the WHY per se - lies in Bush wanting an excuse to invade Iraq for oil prices. THAT to me is a possibility and an answer as to WHY someone would go to such lengths - the how/machinations of such a theory is another story. With the moon landing conspiracies, I understand why NASA would go to great lengths to fool the entire world (because it was a huge factor in the Cold War and it was either the US or USSR getting there first) but at the same time I just don't believe in any of it. I believe we went to the moon and that was it. Even though I do question how the camera lens didn't break due to the atmospheric conditions/pressure being different on the moon to on Earth, and the radiation belt stemming from exiting Earth's atmosphere - but there's probably just an explanation for that that I am unaware of. At the end of the day the moon landing is a great example of a somewhat credible, compelling conspiracy, it just isn't true to what I believe, but these conspiracies set the bar for me in terms of what is plausible and what isn't.

saintsfearful پیش 16 روز

Where do you live, a parking garage?

Jon Smith پیش 16 روز

I vote for doing a Fact Fiend on the moon conspiracy directed by Stanley Kubrick. Is so dumb, but so ridiculously layered.

Jacob Marr پیش 16 روز

The bigger the conspiracy the more likely the failure. Hundreds of NASA employees thousands of contractors plus the USSR wanting to make USA look like idiots all saying its real. Odds of success far smaller than the 0.01 chance of successful Moon landing that Bill Kaysing believed

speedy01247 پیش 16 روز

New conspiracy Karl was kidnapped by NASA and is being used to further propagate their claims to have landed on the moon, so no other nation gets antsy and decides to do it themselves. this will allow Nasa enough time to actually land on the moon for real in 2024 thus protecting Americas claim of first even if it was several decades off.

Siyo پیش 16 روز

I'm behind on the Fact Fiend Extended Universe lore, what happened?

Katniss پیش 16 روز

Nice greenscreen :P

Mike Smith پیش 16 روز

Two questions. 1) You're stilling shooting in quarantine? and 2) You're bedroom is a raw concrete wall? Seriously? I'm not sure which is worse.

A Youtube Channel پیش 16 روز

I got a better question: Where are all the stars? Considering they are facing away from the 'Sun', the photons should not be able to stop all the light from extra-solar stars from reaching the astronauts. In addition, why did they not take a picture of the Sun: I wanted to see that and I thought it would be pretty cool.

-Yuri - پیش 15 روز

Didn't one astronaut pointed a camera to the sun and it fried it ? Also the stars wouldn't be visible because the sun-lit moon is very bright, so they weren't (and couldn't) taking long exposure photos.

Seele2015au پیش 17 روز

In much the same way, the original "surgeon's picture" of Nessie was never analysed until Geoffrey Crawley (of British Journal of Photography" did it, with the addition of the camera used it became simple to calculate the actual size of Nessie , which turned out to be a small model. Crawley was also well known for positively proving the Cottingley Fairy pictures were also hoaxes.

Fairydance Creations پیش 17 روز

I love that you can debunk the theory yourself buy buying a laser from wish and setting up a resiver.

mgcarrigan پیش 17 روز

I believe NASA did admit they had faked some photos just to recreate something they couldn't photo. Side note the grand conspiracy of the moon was released under the Obama administration was we knocked the flag over when they took off from the moon.

Bad snaxx پیش 17 روز

Jodrell Bank observatory followed the moon landing in 1969 with their radio telescopes. The descent to the surface of the moon was printed out showing the angle of descent the lunar module took, when Neil Armstrong took manual control to avoid boulders on the surface, the flight path correction was instantly shown on the paper. This could never have occurred if the moon landing was a hoax.

Sciver Zero پیش 17 روز

tried orienting the lights laterally in opposing directions to your side, and putting a white sheet in front of you to help diffuse the light more generally in the front? Or similarly just using a lot of diffuse reflectors and lamps facing away from you?

Sonic Fortress پیش 17 روز

Im supposed to believe a story by a npc cliche?!

Crawford Wice پیش 17 روز

Welcome to twattown. Population you

Canine Lupus پیش 17 روز

My stepdad has seen the moon landing site through a telescope.

The Book Of The Sun پیش 17 روز

Dude, stop fooling yourself and your viewers. The 'moon flag waving' is not an idea that comes from a photo, it comes from VIDEO FOOTAGE of an astronauts skipping past the flag and the flag WAVING.

AmboNec پیش 17 روز

6:30 from the Sun angle, much of the terrain is shade, making it look darker. You can see that the LEM is to the right and behind the camera in Aldrin's visor and (diffusely) reflected light from it is illuminating Aldrin's suit. There's footage of astronauts stumbling, and getting up much differently than on Earth. On later missions, the dust kicked up by the rover wheels fall much too slow for Earth. Another segment shows a roll of tape attached to the descent module swinging but the period matches lunar gravity. 9:30 as well as the support holding the flag up at the top, there's wires embedded in it to give the 'waving' appearance, the pole being too small to generate such even if there was a wind

KionKamon پیش 17 روز

I’ve always believed that the moon landing was real. And you know there’s one piece of circumstantial evidence that proves it happened. Either Buzz Aldrin or Neil Armstrong punched someone who accused them of faking the landing. I can’t remember which of the two it was though.

n/a n/a پیش 17 روز

Can we start calling NASA Astronauts "Nastronauts"?

jay kinsland پیش 17 روز

I hate the moon landing conspiracy so much. Like it completely ignores all the hard work that many scientists, astronauts and mathematicians went through, many lives lost and experiments just for one guy on IRitem to be like "yeah, never happened". Not even Russia contests the idea that america went to the moon, reminder that the whole space race was to find out if there was anything there that could put them ahead in the cold war, when they found out it was just a giant rock, that was that.

Doughy Littleboi پیش 18 روز

What happened to the office, why are you in your room? (Not to be rude just curious).

Spidercon Prime پیش 18 روز

Theres a whole other reason it couldnt be fake. The lighting there is nearly impossible to get anywhere except the moon. It wouldve taken a wall of super costly lasers to copy the effect. In other words, itd cost more to fake the moon landing, then go to the actual moon.

Darío Bravo پیش 18 روز

I need that fucking T-shirt!

Sebastian Przybyła پیش 18 روز

Well, the quality of newly published scans isn't all that surprising. The photos were taken on excellent good old Ektachrome in medium format, with camera made by one of the best brands ever (Hasselblad). They've been looking great from the beginning, only the scanning technology of the era lowered the resolution and bumped the contrast.

Jordan Perry پیش 18 روز

The corners are the green screen

Marvelous Opinion پیش 18 روز

2 things that lead me to be sceptical of the whole situation is, the flight recorder was lost or destroyed and we haven't been to the moon since. But yet we wanna go to Mars??? Ok have fun with that Journey

Tony Touch پیش 18 روز

A while back I watched "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon" 32.17. It blow my mind!

Mad George پیش 18 روز

"conspiracy theories are just rediculous anyway" - oof, this is a horrible way of thinking. There are plenty of conspiracy theories that turned out to be 100% true.

Michael Farrell پیش 18 روز

The odds of having a supercomputer in your pocket were probably pretty low in the 90's and look where we are now

JohnR2319881222 پیش 18 روز

I listen more than watch, so you look the same.

Aichi1138 پیش 18 روز

The only fake moon landing theory I will subscribe too, and that is Stanly Kubrik was directed to film it, and the dud is such a perfectionist he demanded to film on location

sur-taka پیش 18 روز

if the US was smart, they would have faked the moon landing, instead of wasting billions to send people on a life-threatening mission, just so they can collect a few rocks and plant a flag... but i guess the US really likes planting flags...

heddecatamer پیش 18 روز

Are NASA telling you to say this Blink once for yes, and twice for no

Fiona-Jayne Massie پیش 18 روز

That's your bedroom? Do you sleep in a concrete garage?

Gage O'Coy پیش 18 روز

Have I missed somthing, like I've watch this for years and now having to re watch videos because of Quaran Fiend can anyone help me out 😂

shockle28 پیش 18 روز

"All conspiracies are stupid" except the ones proven to be true right? Like project sunshine for example. The US government stealing dead children after hiroshima bombing. The only opinions that are stupid imo are peoples opinions that disregard evidence because it doesn't fit into the version in their mind that they believe or were taught. Always be ready to change your mind when presented with new information, or remain ignorant

Mustachio پیش 18 روز

I get you can't chromakey anything, but why can't you buy a new green screen on amazon?

Andrew Macdonald پیش 18 روز

Fun fact, its just as ignorant to write off or mock all conspiracies as it is to believe in them all.

Anthony Cook پیش 19 روز

Why the fuck is your bedroom wall bare concrete, ya mad lad

IPlayYouWatch پیش 19 روز

You should buy a ps2 and play ratchet and clank on your other channel

Isaiah Reilly پیش 19 روز

I don't know how true this is, but some one once told me- in a conversation about conspiracy theories- "It would be more expensive to fake the moon landing than it would be to actually put someone on the moon"

James Blackburn پیش 19 روز

How do you explain the strings????

Kiloechovictor پیش 19 روز

Am I the only one who can't get over Karl's tattoo. It's so clean, I love it. Great video as always

Kiloechovictor پیش 17 روز

@Noah Collingwood from what ive gathered its some sort of outer space scene. It looks so good.

Noah Collingwood پیش 17 روز

I like it, but I've been trying to figure out what it is. I can tell the line work and shading is on point, just can't make out the design. Any idea what it is?

A G پیش 19 روز

Fuckin mad lad put the corners of the green screen on a cement wall lolol

Declan Sheehan پیش 19 روز

If I remember correctly people will also claim either Armstrong or Aldrin were too well lit despite being in the shadow of the craft but that can be explained by the fact that the lunar surface reflects light from the sun?

astari _ پیش 19 روز

They were obviously using ring lights when they photod buzz Aldrin

stan vaughan پیش 19 روز

Unleash the death threats

kowalski 69 پیش 19 روز

i don't think anyone gives a shit about your shadows

Nathan Cao پیش 19 روز

Sriracha Hot Chili Sauce

Discover Your World پیش 19 روز

Are you Danny?

Mad Tui پیش 19 روز

Ever notice that there's an 'R' before the 'I' in Sriracha?

Duckter Doland پیش 19 روز

With the risk of beeing one of these stupid people I have to ask how they got through the radiation belt unharmed?

Hmm Okay. پیش 19 روز

Thank you

Flumbo Frommelkont پیش 19 روز

Conspiracy theory: Karls's "bedroom wall" is actually a previous recording of a different green screen overlaid with a concrete texture and used as a backdrop for THIS video, which was also green screened. Karl is just trying to hide it by putting the image references in front of him rather than behind. I was the only one to figure this out because Karl was stupid enough to leave some funky pixels behind in the corners and around his outline that in no way are the result of shitty youtube compression I swear! His uncompressed original files are just proof he edited it and also he destroyed to original tapes anyway so there's no evidence anymore, is there no length this man will go through to hide his blatant LIES!? He even made sure his tattoo would no longer be picked up and show the background. COINCIDENCE? I THINK NOT! Open your eyes sheeple, the truth is out there, question everything.

بعد